فرایند تضعیف همخوان /b/ در گویش تالشی دیگه‌سرایی در چارچوب رویکرد بهینگی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردبیل، اردبیل، ایران.

2 استادیار زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

چکیده

این مقاله به توصیف و تحلیل فرایند تضعیف همخوان /b/ در گویش تالشی‌ دیگه‌سرایی در چارچوب نظریة بهینگی می‌پردازد .این فرایند در جایگاه‌های پایانة هجا، در خوشه‌های همخوانی و میان‌واکه‌ای اتفاق می‌افتد. گاهی در آغازة هجا نیز به مواردی بر‌می‌خوریم که به دلایل تاریخی آن­ها پرداخته‌ایم. در این تحقیق با استفاده از نظریة بهینگی نشان داده می‌شود که محدودیت رعایت توالی رسایی که فرایندی فعال در اکثر زبان‌ها می‌باشد، نمی‌تواند عامل تحریک فرایند تضعیف درگویش تالشی ‌دیگه‌سرایی باشد و محرک این عامل باید محدودیت عدم حضور همخوان دارای مشخصة [-cont, – delrel+voice+labial] * بعد از مرکز هجا باشد. همچنین استدلال می‌شود که اولویت­دادن به این  محدودیت در این گویش باعث می‌شود با وجود ارضانشدن محدودیت توالی‌ رسایی، فرایند تضعیف نسبت به فرایندهای حذف و درج فرایند بهینه‌تری قلمداد شود. اما در محیط خاصی بعد از واج /r/  فرایند تضعیف روی همخوان /b/ صورت نمی‌گیرد و محرک این عامل باید محدودیت [+liquids-lateral+ long v+ cons(v)] * دانست. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Lenition of /b/ in Digehsaraee Taleshi Dialect within the Framework of Optimality Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • shahram fallah digehsara 1
  • Mohammad Razinejad 2
1 Department of Linguistics, Faculty of humanity, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, UMA
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The scientific study of local languages ​​and dialects can provide many theoretical and scientific results and help in better understanding of language knowledge and its enrichment. Taleshi as one of the coastal languages ​​of Caspian Sea belongs to the languages ​​of the north western group of Iranian languages. This dialect is related to other dialects of the Caspian coast and also connected with the central dialects of Iran. Some linguists have divided Taleshi into three groups: Northern Talshi common in the Republic of Azarbaijan, Central Taleshi common in more southern regions such as Asalem and Paresar as a section of Razvanshahr, and Southern Taleshi common in Shanderman, Masal, Shaft, Foman and Somaesara, which is closer to Tati and there is mutual understanding between them. (Stillo, 2015: 413).
The present study explains the lenition of the consonant /b/ in the Taleshi dialect of Digehsaree within the framework of optimality theory. This process happens at the end of the syllable, in consonant clusters, and between vowels. Sometimes, it occurs at the beginning of the syllable which have been discussed for its historical reasons.
The current research, which was conducted in a descriptive-analytical method and based on the theory of optimality, seeks to find answers to such questions as: What is the mechanism of the lenition in Taleshi Digehsaraee dialect regarding the consonant /b/ in different environments? In which environment lenition does not occur? What are the active restrictions concerning this process and what are their order?
Research background
The studies conducted on phonological processes in different dialects and languages within the theoretical framework of optimality are discussed. The methods in aforementioned studies are descriptive-analytical, and the results indicate that there are various processes of assimilation, dissimilation, insertion, deletion, compensatory lengthening, lenition and strengthening in these dialects and languages. The analysis of data on the constraints and the different arrangements of constraints in each language and dialect has been very useful and effective in conducting this research. The present research rejects Hart's theory that the lenition does not occur in the initial or inter-vowel position. In Taleshi Digesaree dialect, lenition also happens in the position between two vowels.
Research Methods
The approach of this study is the phonological system of the Taleshi-Digehsaree dialect, a formal approach, aimed at the normal speech of native speakers. The method used in the phonetics and phone extraction section is generally based on examples of the normal speech by the speakers of this dialect. To conduct this research, twenty illiterate native speakers of Digehsara village with an age range of 40 to 70 (ten women and ten men) were interviewed for one hour and the data were recorded. Also, the author is a speaker of this dialect and the research method is descriptive-analytical. The theoretical framework in this research is the theory of optimality, which is one of the dominant theories in the present decade and is considered very popular and influential in linguistics. The main goal of this theory is to compare options according to a hierarchy of constraints.
Results and discussion
The factor that provokes lenition in Taleshi Dialect of Digehsaraee should be the restriction of not having a consonant with the characteristic *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial] after the center of the syllable. There are cases that with the lenition of the first consonant in syllable-final consonant clusters but there is still a sequencing problem. For example, the word Qabz is pronounced as Qafz, which still has a sequencing problem. There is another evidence that the lenition in syllable-terminal clusters is not a restriction of sonority sequence. Definitely, in the clusters at the end of the syllable of the word / zabt /, the sequence of articulation is well observed and we see a descending sequence of articulation at the end of the syllable. Applying lenition to observe the sonority sequence will be a mistake and this is against the principle of linguistic economy. Therefore, the lenition must have another stimulus. So, it can be concluded that in Taleshi Dialect, the sound after the core should not have the characteristic *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial]. According to the above limitation, the tendency of the language is that the obstruent sound /b/, which has the characteristic of [-continuous-delayed release + vowel + labial], should not come after the nucleus and if it occurs, this violation should be compensated as much as possible. Therefore, Taleshi Dialect uses lenition. The transformation of obstruent into fricative consonants, called friction, occurs in the context between two vowels or after a vowel, so that it is considered a kind of lenition. (Kenstowicz, 1994) This is somewhat equivalent to constraint * [-cont - delrel+voice+labial] due to the absence of the obstruent consonant /b/, and it has the characteristic of *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial] after the nucleus.
In Taleshi Dialect of Digehsaraee, the constraint *[-cont-delrel+voice+labial] is applied to non-cluster consonants in addition to consonant clusters at the end of the syllable. For example, the inflectional form of the word water /ᾱb/ is pronounced as /ᾱv/. This constraint is also applied in the position between two vowels. For instance, the word bean /Lubјᾱ/ is pronounced as /Luvјᾱ/. The word /dubᾱre/ is pronounced again as /dǝvᾱra/. It can be seen that the consonant /b/ between the two vowels has also been transformed into the fricative consonant /v/ using the lenition to satisfy the *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial] constraint. Therefore, this can be considered as a dominant constraint in Taleshi dialect. This constraint is also applied in the v-c# position, i.e. between a vowel and a consonant at the end of the syllable. For example, the word tiger /babr/ is pronounced as/ bavr/ or the word patience /sabr/ as /savr/. This constraint is also applied in the v:-# position, i.e. after the long vowel at the end of the syllable. The word šib is pronounced as šiv or the word sib is pronounced as sif. The consonant /b/ after long vowels also satisfies the constraint *[-cont– delrel+voice+labial].
Some of the words in the Taleshi dialect, such as [var] barf, [vᾱ] wind, [vang] bang, have historical roots before being affected by the lenition. In other words, the original (old) form of these words in the languages Avestan and Middle Farsi are in their modern form and are still preserved in some dialects, including the Taleshi dialect. But in a certain context, the /b/ consonant is not affected by the *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial] constraint and remains the same as the /b/ consonant. This happens if we have a syllable (rv:) before the phoneme /b/, the lenition is not applied in this environment. The stimulus of this factor should be seen as the constraint * [+liquids-lateral+ long v+ cons(v)]. So, the sequence of constraints governing the Taleshi Digehsaraee dialect can be written as follows.
*[+liquids-lateral+ long v+cons(v)], LIN, MAX, DEP,>> SON-SEQ, *[-cont– delrel+voice+labial], IDENT(f), >>Complex Coda
Conclusion
The stimulus of the lenition should be considered as the constraint *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial]. The tendency of this constraint is that the phone after the nucleus does not have the characteristic * [-cont – delrel+voice+labial]. According to this constraint, there is a tendency in Taleshi Digehsaraee dialect in which the obstruent consonant /b/ does not come after the nucleus, and if it does, this violation is compensated as much as possible. The constraint *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial] applies to non-cluster consonants in addition to consonant clusters. But in a certain context, the consonant /b/ is not affected by the constraint *[-cont – delrel+voice+labial] and remains the same consonant /b/. This happens if we have a syllable (rv:) before the consonant /b/, which the lenition is not applied in this context. The stimulus of this factor should be known as the constraint* [+liquids-lateral+ long v+ cons(v)], which means that whenever we have a long vowel after /r/, the lenition is not applied. The reason for this is related to the phonological system of the Taleshi dialect, which does not allow such a sequence within a syllable in the Taleshi dialect.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Lenition
  • Faithfulness and Markedness constraints
  • Optimality Theory
  • Sonority Sequence
  • Dighesaree Talishi Dialect
احمدخانی، محمدرضا و آناهیتا لطیفی (1398) بررسی برخی از فرایندهای واجی در گویش بروجردی در مقایسه با فارسی معیار با تلفیقی از رویکرد واج­شناسی زایشی و نظریه بهینگی. مطالعات زبان و گویش‌های غرب ایران، 7 (24)، صص. 1-24.
آقاگل­زاده، فردوس (1383). برخی تغییرات آوایی و فرایندهای واجی فعال در گویش مازندرانی. فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی. 1 (3)، صص. 4-12.
بدخشان ابراهیم و محمد زمانی (۱۳۹۵). تحلیل و توصیف فرایند نرم‌شدگی در زبان کردی گویش کلهری. زبان‌پژوهی، تابستان (۱۹)، صص. 89-101.
پالیزبان، کرم­اله، نجفیان، کرمپور و احمدخانی (2019). تفاوت رفتاری فرایندهای واجی و واژ واجی در چارچوب رویکرد بهینگی: بررسی فرایند تضعیف در گویش کردی ایلام. مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران7(26)، صص. 17-32.‎
دبیر مقدم، محمد (1383). نظریة بهینگی. متن پژوهی ادبی، 8 (20) صص. 185-197.
رضایتی کیشه‌خاله، محرم (1386). زبان تالشی، توصیف گویش مرکزی. فرهنگ الیا.
رفیعی، علی (1386) لغت­نامة تالشی. رشت: دانشگاه گیلان.
عبدلی علی (1393) فرهنگ تطبیقی تالشی- تاتی و آذری دیرین. تهران:  انتشارات شرکت سهامی انتشار.
کامبوزیا کردزعفرانلو، عالیه و فاطمه نعمتی (1386). برخی فرایندهای واجی در گویش دلواری.‎ علوم انسانی الزهرا، 16-17 (63-64) صص. 181-207.
کامبوزیا کرد زعفرانلو، عالیه (1382). فرایند تضعیف در زبان فارسی، جستارهای ادبی، پیاپی 142، صص. 74-83.
کامبوزیا کرد ‌زعفرانلو، عالیه، الهام ثباتی و فردوس آقاگل­زاده (1394). فرایندهای واجی تضعیف در گونه‌های کردی ایلامی. پژوهش‌های زبان­شناسی تطبیقی، 5 (9)، صص. 207-225.
مدرسی قوامی، گلناز، الهامی خراسانی و سهند (1397). شباهت‌گریزی و حذف انسدادی پایانی در خوشه‌های همخوانی زبان فارسی در چارچوب نظریۀ بهینگی. علم زبان، 5 (7)، صص. 87-53.‎
مسرور ماسالی، فرامرز (1386) فرهنگ لغات تالشی. بی­جا.
Abdoli, A. (2013). Comparative culture of Taleshi-Tati and ancient Azeri. Publishing company. [In Persian]
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2004). Some phonetic changes and active phonological processes in Mazandarani dialect. Persian Language and Literature Academy. 1 (3), 4-12. [In Persian]
Ahmadkhani M. R and A. Latifi. (2019) Investigating some phonological processes in Borujerdi dialect in comparison with standard Persian with a combination of generative phonological approach and optimality theory.  Studies of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 7 (24),1-24. [In Persian]
Brogan, F. D. (2018). Sociophonetically-based phonology: An optimality theoretic account of/s/lenition in Salvadoran Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
Cambozia Kurdzafaranlou, A . E, Sabati and F, Aghagolzadeh. (2014). Phonological processes of weakening in Ilami Kurdish varieties. Researches in Comparative Linguistics, 5 (9), 207-225. [In Persian]
Cambozia Kurdzafaranlou, A and F, Nemati. (2006). Some phonological processes in Delwari dialect. Al-Zahra Journal of Human Sciences, Volumes 17 and 16, No 63 and 64, Linguistics),181-207. [In Persian]
Cambozia Kurdzafaranlou, A. (2002). The weakening process in Persian language, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Journal of the Faculty of Humanities, 36, vol. 3, 74-83. [In Persian]
Chong, A. J. (2011). Lenition in Gaalpu: an optimality theoretic analysis.  Australian Journal of Linguistics31(4), 473-490.
Corbin, L. (2006). The phonetics and phonology of s-lenition and vowel laxing in eastern Andalusian Spanish. Williams College, Williamstown, MA, BA honors thesis.
Crystal, D. (2011). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, John Wiley & Sons.
Dabirmoghaddam, M. (2004). Optimality theory. Text of Literary Research, Volume 8, No. 22, 185-197. [In Persian]
File-Muriel, R. J., and E. K. Brown (2010). The gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2),7.
Hart, M. S. (2010). Consonant lenition in Danish. Master's thesis, Universitetet i Tromsø).
Hualde, J. I., M. Simonet., & M. Nadeu (2011). Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization. Laboratory phonology, 2 (2), 301-329.
Jacobs, H. (1994). Lenition and optimality theory. Proceedings of LSRL XXIV.
Jam, B., & Zalaghi, A. (2014). An Optimality–Theoretic Account of changing/u/to [I] in Silakhori Dialect. Language Research. 4(2), 21-40.
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kenstowicz, M. J. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar (Vol. 7). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Langendoen, D. T., and D. Archangeli (1997). Optimality theory: an overview, Basil Blackwell.
Legendre, G., J. B. Grimshaw. & S. Vikner (2001). Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
MacKenzie, D. N. (2014). A concise Pahlavi dictionary. New York: Routledge.
Masrour Masali, F. (2006). Taleshi vocabulary. Ilia Farhang Publications.
McCarthy, J. J. (2002). A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Modarresi, G. G., and K. S. Elhami (2018). Similarity Avoidance and Final Stop Deletion in Consonantal Clusters of Persian within Optimality Theory Framework., 53-87. [In Persian]
Palizban, K., A, Najafian., F, Karampour., And M.R, Ahmadkhani. (2018). Behavioral difference of phonological processes and phonological lexicon in the framework of optimality theory: Investigation of weakening process in Ilam Kurdish dialect. Studies of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 7(26),17-32. [In Persian]
Rafii, A., and Abdoli, A. (2012). Taleshi dictionary. Gilan University Publications. [In Persian]
Rezayati Kishekhaleh, M. (2007). Taleshi language, description of the central dialect. Ilia Farhang Publications. [In Persian]
Smith, J. L. (2012). The formal definition of the ONSET constraint and implications for Korean syllable structure. Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. pp. 73-108.
Stilo, D. (2015). The polygenetic origins of the Northern Taleyshi language. In Studies on Iran and The Caucasus. pp. 411-453. Brill.
Trask, R. L. (1996). Historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zamani, M., and E. Badakhshan (2016).  Description and analysis of lenition in Kalhori Kurdish. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research). 8(20), 89-101.