نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری زبانشناسی همگانی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران
2 استادیار گروه زبان شناسی،دانشکده علوم انسانی،واحد مرودشت،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،مرودشت،ایران.
3 استادیار گروه زبانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.
4 استادیار گروه زبان های خارجی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مرودشت، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The representation of Muslims in English-language media is still fraught with challenges. Negative stereotypes and one-sided images remain dominant. They can normalize and legitimate racism through their discourses and contribute to its reproduction at the societal level. This study with a descriptive- analytical approach, examines various ways of delegitimizing Muslim’s protests against the publication of offensive cartoons by Charlie Hebdo in the news of four western media outlets: The New York times, The Guardian, The Washington Post and BBC, from 2020 to 2024, using the concepts of VanDijk’s ideological square and discursive strategies. In this regard, the discourse components in this news report were identified and then each of them was analyzed according to the discursive strategies. The findings of this research indicate that the author of this news report highlighted the positive characteristics of insiders (non-Muslims) and marginalized the negative characteristics of non-insiders, that is, Muslims. In this regard, discursive strategies such as: lexicalization, Authority, Norm Expression, Victimization, Evidentiality, Hyperbole, Categorization, Euphemism, Implication, Irony, Number Game, Generalization, National Self-Glorification have been used to persuade the readers.
کلیدواژهها [English]