Default Inheritance in Constructional Schemas of Persian Complex words

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Linguistics, ,Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom , Iran

Abstract

This research investigates how to specify grammatical features of Persian complex words, including morphological, syntactic, and semantic features in the framework of Construction Morphology (Booij, 2010 &2017). In this regard, 200 complex words were examined using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings showed complex words received grammatical features including morphological/ semantic features and categories from the main schema and subschemas dominating them through the inheritance mechanism. Also, suffixes -esh and -an in complex words are realized as an exponent of some part of their construction and their different meanings are due to their presence in a construction with a polysemous pattern.
 
Furthermore, assuming the existence of two formal and semantic aspects in the construction of these words and establishing a systematic relationship between the two, a unified method can be used for explaining all types of data in this research, although its challenge is what makes the grammatical analysis of the construction of this type of Persian data partially unconstrained. In sum, the meaning of different data with different morphological complexity is motivated through polysemous pattern, subpart relationship and construction-bound meaning in schema and its subschemas. More importantly, by attaining a few constructional subschemas under the dominance of the main schema, it is possible to explain less regular and idiosyncratic Persian data as well as regular ones, without looking for secondary solutions for different meanings of the above suffixes in Persian derived words and constructional idioms, zero morphs for suffixless compounds and right-head/left-head rule for compounds in accounting for irregularities.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abbasi Z. (2017). "Analyzing Complex Words in Persian in Construction Morphology and Lexical Morphology/Phonology". LRR, 2017; 8 (3) :67-93[In Persian] .URL: http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/
Anvari, H. (2003). Sokhan Comprehensive Dictionary (Persian to Persian 8 Volumes). SOKHAN. [In Persian]  
Arcodia, G.F. (2012)."Constructions and Headedness in Derivation and Compounding". Morphology 22, 365–397 (2012/ 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-011-9189-2.
Arcodia, G.F. and Basciano, B. (2018). "The Construction Morphology Analysis of Chinese Word Formation". In G. Booij (ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology, Volume 4. Springer, 219-253.
Arkan, F. & Heydarpour Bidgoli, T. (2018). Morphology: Theoretical Approaches and Their Applications in Persian Language Analysis. Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
Arkan, F.& Safari, A. (2017). "An Analysis of Persian Compound Nouns as Constructions". Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9 (1), 33-58.
Bahrami-Khorshid, S. (2019). Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Foundations and Application in
Booij, G. (2018).  "The Construction of Words: Introduction and Overview". In Booij, G. (ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology. Studies in Morphology, Vol. 4. Springer.
Booij, G.  (2017). "Inheritance and Motivation in Construction Morphology". In Defaults in Morphological Theory, Nikolas Gisborne and Andrew Hippisley (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2013).  "Inheritance issues in Construction Morphology". N. Gisborne and A. Hippisley (eds.), Default Inheritance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.                           
Booij, G.  (2010).  Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2009). "Compounding and construction morphology". In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–216.
Booij, G.  (2007). "Construction morphology and the lexicon". In Montermini, F., Boyé, G. and Hathout, N.(eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, Somerville (MA): Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 34-44.
Booij, G.  (2005). The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. & Audring, J. (2108) .Category Change from a Constructional Perspective. Ed. Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.  
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typologi­cal Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1988). "The Mechanisms of Construction Grammar". Proceedings of the   Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Vol.14, 35-55.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). "Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language". Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol.7 (5), 219-224.
Keshani, Kh. (1993). Zansou Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Institute for University Press. [In Persian]
Kerevičiene, J. (2009). Glossary of Cognitive Terms. Kaunas, 2009, 22 p.
Lieber, R. (1981). On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington (Ind.): Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Lieber, R. (1983), "Argument linking and Compounds in Englis ". Linguistic Inquiry, No. 14, 251 -285.
Rafiei, A. (2012).  "Agent Meaning in the Derived Words of Persian". Journal of Researches in    Linguistics, No. 7, 19-32. [In Persian]
Rafie, A. & Torabi, S. (2014).  Inheritance and Motivation of Form and Meaning in Lexicon:    Instantiations of Persian Word Formation Pattern"Journal of Language Science, Vol.2 Issue: 3. [In Persian]
Safari, a. & Niknasab, L. (2020). “A Constructional Account of Word Formation in Persian: Evidence from Compounding”. Scientific Journal of Language Research, Vol. 12, No. 36. [In Persian]. http://jlr.alzahra.ac.ir
Williams, E. (1981). "On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”" . Linguistic Inquiry, 12,   245-274.
Zwicky, A. M. (1985). "Heads". Journal of Linguistics, 21, 1-29.