Focus Marker dA in Azerbaijani Turkish

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of English and Linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad university, Zanjan, Iran

2 Department of linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad university, Zanjan, Iran

3 Department of English and Linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to examine the behavior of the focus marker "dA" in the Azeri Turkish language and demonstrate its position in the sentence. We showed that focus in Azeri Turkish is used in three ways: syntactically (via scrambling), phonetically (via focal stress), and morphologically (use of a focus marker). Focus markers are either used solely to highlight elements within a clause without any other function, or they may have other roles but are stripped of those roles and used solely for prominence. Through multiple examples from Azeri Turkish, we demonstrated that this focus marker, which mostly has an additive role, is added in situ to all sentence elements—subject, direct object, adverb of time, adverb of place, and the whole sentence—to make them prominent. We showed that in Azeri Turkish, unlike in Turkish (Istanbul Turkish), "dA" only functions as a focus marker and does not serve as a topic marker. The data analysis revealed that the focus marker "ki" can also be used alongside "dA" for additional emphasis. Sometimes, more than two focus markers can be employed in a single sentence to emphasize different elements. Attempts were made to illustrate the focalized elements in tree diagrams based on the Minimalist Program model.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239-298. 
Dabir-moghadam, M. (2011). Theoretical linguistics: Emergence and development of Generative Grammar. Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Givon, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins..
Göksel, A., & özsoy, S. (2003). dA: A focus/topic associated clitic in Turkish. Lingua, 113, 1143-1167.
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kalafchi Khiabani, M. (2005). Scrambling in Azerbaijani Turkish. Unpublished MA Thesis in Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University. [in Persian]
Karimi, S. (2005). A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Moharrami Gheydari, S. (2024). Focus Representation in Azerbaijani Turkish based on Form-Function Theory. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch. [in Persian]
Oroji, M.R. & Rezaei, A. (2013). Exploring “ke” as a focus particle in Persian from both form and function points of view. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(1), 76-84.
Oroji, M.R. (2012). Pre-posing to the beginning of a sentence in Persian: Topicalization or focalization? Dastoor, Name-Farhangestan, 8, 188-212. [in Persian]
Otoguro, R. (2003). Focus clitics and discourse information spreading. Proceedings of the LFG03 Conference. CSLI Publications.
Rasekh-mahand, M. (2003). Scrambling in Persian. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba’i University.  [in Persian]
Rasekh-mahand, M. (2006). The relationship between scrambling and focus in Persian, Dastoor, Name-Farhangestan, 2, 20-33. [in Persian]
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Shahidi, N. (2000). Topicalization in Persian with regards to functionalism. Unpublished MA Thesis in Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University. [in Persian]