Clitics in Taleshi and Tati Languages: A Typological Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD. Candidate/ Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch

2 Associate Professor/ Tehran University

3 Associate Professor/ Payam Nour University

4 Associate Professor/ SAMT Organization

Abstract

The article has been written according to a typological survey on clitic as a linguistic particle in Taleshi and Tati language which is one of the northwest and Caspian Seaboard languages. To consider that both Taleshi and Tati are from the same language family and different classification of clitics among Iranian dialects and languages, the writer purposes to determine the variation of clitics and their position in these two languages. Into the research, linguistic data of Taleshi and Tati has been investigated based on a questionnaire of clitics on the Max Plank website. It has been arranged on typological investigations of clitics on which has been analyzed in 5 separable parts including general features of the language, categories, specific features, place of clitics in the phrases, and its movement. The data collected from the central regions of Talesh City and Takistan province has been analyzed on basis of the descriptive-analytical- comparative method. The results will express that there is a sameness on general features and differences in variation and categories of clitics between these two languages. Also, some specific features of clitics such as stress, ordering, gap, and functions in the sentences are the same between both of these languages. Moreover, the position of clitics and their movements are the same in Taleshi and Tati and Wackernagel’s law about the second position is verifiable for these languages.

Keywords


Anderson, S. (2005). Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press .
Comrie, B .(1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
Condoravdi, C. & P. Kiparsky (2004). Clitics and clause structure. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 2(1) : 1-39.
Dryer, M. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68 (1), pp. 81-131.
Gabelentz,G. V. (1891). Die Sprachwissenchafi:IhreAufgaben.Methoden Und Bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig T.O. Weigel. 2nd ed., Leipzig: C.H.Tauchnitz, 1901.
Greenberg, Josef, H. (1963). The Languages of Africa. International Journal of American Linguistics. 29: 1. Bloomington: Indiana University and the Hague: Mouton.
Greenberg, J. H. (1974). Language typology: A historical and analytic overview. Paris: Mouton.
Halpern, A. L. & A. M. Zwicky. (1995). Approaching second: second position clitics and related phenomena, Standford CSLI Publications.3 (2), pp. 579-612.
Haspelmath, M., & Dryer, M.S.,& Gil,D.,& Comrie, B. (2005). The world atlas of languages structure. New York: Oxford University Press. Inc.
Klavans, J. L. (1982). Some problems in a theory of clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Miller, B. V. (1953). Talyšskij jazyk. Milano: MoskvaPIzd. AN SSSR.
Riet, V., & Veselovska, L. (1999). Clitic quetionnaire. 5 clitics in the languages of Europe. Edited by Henk Van Riemsdijk. Mouton De Gruyter, pp: 891-1009.
Samvelian, P. (2005). When morphology does better than syntax: the ezafe construction in persian. Studia Iranica.26 (2), pp. 79-96.
Sportiche, D. (1992). Clitic construction , Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33 (3), pp. 213-276.
Stilo, D.(2001). Gilan-languages,̎ in Encyclopedia Iranica, edited by. Ehsan Yarshater. 10 (6), pp. 660-668.
Tegey, H. (1978). Ergativity in pashto (Afghani). Pasto Quarterly, 1 (3), pp. 369-418.
Wackernagel, J.(1892). ÜbereinGesetz der Indo-Germanischen Wortstellung.      Indogermanische   Forschungen, 1 (2), pp. 333-436.   
Zwicky, A. M. & G. K. Pullum. (1983). Cliticization vs. infelection: English N’T. Language, 59 (3), pp. 502-513.
Zwicky, A. M. (1977). On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.