Redefining Dialectical Vague Terms via Fuzzy Set Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Abstract

Vagueness is an intrinsic feature of natural languages. A noticeable number of linguistic terms and variables are not clear, accurate, and certain. Although employing uncertain terms such as accent, dialect, and language variety imply a clear-cut linguistic area, our experience leads us toward a fuzzy division of linguistic area without definite boundaries; these terms are vague. To make the ambiguity of these terms clear, therefore, current study applied fuzzy logic in clustering language varieties and illustrating their linguistic interrelationship. It shows that a variety can belong in one or multiple sets of language varieties simultaneously, to some specific but different values. Truth value or the degree of membership may be any real number between 0 and 1 which accurately represents the relation in the cluster. Therefore, there is no need to accept the integrity of clustering and vagueness implied in terms like language, dialect, and accent in their traditional definition.

Keywords


Aram, M. R. (2018). Usage of Fuzzy Logic in Interpretation of Qura'nic Paradigms. Burhan Mubin, Journal of Comparative Qura’nic Studies, 1(1), pp.1-5.
Black, M. (1937). Vagueness: An Exercise in Logic Analysis. Philosophy of Science, 4 (4), pp. 427-455.
Bochvar, A.D. (1938). On a three-valued calculus and its application to analysis of paradoxes of classical extended functional calculus. History and Philosophy of Logic, (2), pp. 87–112.
Chambers, J. K. & P. Trudgill (2004). Dialectology. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Jain, A. K. & R. C. Dubes. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. New Yersey: Prentice Hall.
Kleene, S.C. (1938). On a notation for ordinal numbers. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 3 (4), pp.150–155.
Klir, G. & B. Yuan (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. New York:  Prentice-Hall.
Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2 (4), pp.458-508.
Lukasiewicz, Jan. (1951). Aristotle’s syllogistic from standpoint of modern formal logic. Oxford: Oxford university press.
Matthews, P. H. (1997). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oosthuizen, D. & J. Hanekom. (2015). Fuzzy information transmission analysis for continuous speech features. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), pp. 1983-1994.
Pal, S. K., A. K. Datta & D. Majumder. (1978). Adaptive learning algorithm in classification of fuzzy patterns: An application to vowels in CNC context. International Journal of Systems Science. 9 (8), pp. 887-897.
Raptis, S. & G. Carayannis. (1997). Fuzzy logic for rule-based formant speech synthesis. EuroSpeech97 Proceedings. vol.3, pp. 1599-1602.
Taleb, A. & A. Benyettou. (2010). Arabic vowels fuzzy neural network recognition. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10 (10), pp. 848-851.
Tripathy, H. K., B. K. Tripathy & K. Pradip. (2008). A knowledge based approach using fuzzy inference rules for vowel recognition. Journal of Convergence Information Technology. 3 (1), pp. 51-56.
Novak, V. (2001). Antonyms and linguistic quantifiers in fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 124 (3), pp. 335–351.
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics. 5th edition, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
Xi, F. (2013). A study on the vagueness in English language teaching from the pragmatic perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), pp. 1596-1602.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of linguistics variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information sciences, 8 (3), pp. 199-249.
Zadeh L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8 (3), pp. 338–353.