A Typological Study on the Word Order and Agreement Patterns in Evazi Dialect

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Qom Islamic Azad University

2 Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is a typological analysis on word-order and agreement in Evazi dialect, one of the dialects in the south of Fars province. This dialect has shown interesting characteristics in agreement system and word-order which is different from standard Farsi but similar to some other dialects in Fars such as Larestani, Khonji, Bastaki, Bikhei and Gerashi. The research is theoretically based on Dryer (1992) and Dabirmoghadam (1392) in investigating and analyzing 22 typological components of word order in the dialect under investigation. Accordingly, the considered parameters are analyzed in the form of the above 22 word-order components and 3 agreement types which is exemplified in 61 dialect samples and further illustrated in 23 tables within the paper. The research results demonstrates that the agreement system in Evazi dialect reveals a proclitic agreement with the subject of transitive verbs, and suffixal agreement with transitive and intransitive verbs according to which, the subjects of both intransitive and transitive verbs are shown in suffixed forms on the verbs in its agreement system.

Keywords


Bader, M. Hussler, J. (2010). Word order in German: A corpus study. Lingua, 120 (3), pp. 717–762
Bradshaw, J. (1982). Word order in Papua New Guinea Australian languages. Doctoral dissertation.  Retrieved from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/21328/Bradshaw1982-diss_r.pdf?sequence=8.
Butt, M. (1994). Theoretical perspectives on word order in South Asian languages. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Colijin, E. & Tonhaaser, J. (2010). Word order in Paraguayan Guarani. International Journal of American Linguistics. 76 (2), pp. 255-288.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Croft, W. (1993). Case Marking and the Semantics of Mental Verbs. in J. Pustejovsky (ed), Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrech: Kluwer, pp. 55-72.
Dryer, M. S. (1989). Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language, 13, pp. 257-92.
Dryer, M. S. (1992). The Greenbergian word-order correlations. Language. 68, pp. 81-138.
Dryer, M. S. (2003). Word order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographical perspective. eds. J. Thurgood & R. J. LaPolla. the Sino-Tibetan languages, London & New York: Routledge Publishing. pp. 43 –56.
Dryer, M. S. (2008). "Word Order in Tibeto – Burman Languages". linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. no. 31(1). pp. 1- 88.
Greenberg, J. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language. ed. Joseph Greenberg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 73-113.
Hawkins, J. A. (1983). Word order universal. New York: Academic Press.
Kallestinova, E. D. (2007). Aspects of word order in Russian. PhD thesis. University of Iowa.
Lehmann, W. P. (1973). A structural principle of language and its implications. Language. 49, pp. 47-66.
Mackinnon, C. (1995). Dezfuli and Shushtari. Encyclopedia Iranica. VII. Fasc. 4, pp. 350-354.
Mallinson, G. & Blake, B. J. (1981). Language typology: cross – linguistic studies in syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Siewirska, A. (1988). The passive in Slavic. in M Shibatani (ed.), passive and voice. Amesterdam: Benjamins. pp. 243-289.
Song, J. J. (2018). Linguistic typology. Oxford: University Press.
Unvala, J. M. (1959). Contribution to modern persian dialectology: the Luri and Dizfuli dialects. Calcutta: Iran society.
Vennemann, T. (1974). Theoretical word order studies: results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik, 7, pp. 5-25
Whaley, L. J. (1997). Introduction to typology: the unity and diversity of language. CA: Sage.