The Causative/ Anti-causative ALternation in Kurdish (Sorani Dialect)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of English and Linguistics, Islamic Azad University of Sanandaj

2 University of Kurdistan

3 Tehran university

4 Department of English, Farhangian University, Sanandaj

Abstract

The causative/anti-causative alternation has engendered theoretical interest within studies of argument structure at the syntax-semantic interface. The two prominanet appraoches to the syntax of the alternation, that is detransivitation and causation, do not posit distinct lexical entries for the alternation. In other words, these approaches build on the idea that one of the two alternants is derived from the other one. The purpose of this articl; however, is to show, based on Kurdish data, that there is not a derivational two-way relationship between the alternants in the alternation. Rather, it argues that both alternants are derived from a neutral single lexical entry. In so doing, evidence will be drawn from the existence of morphological variations on these alternations, verb selections and restrictions, and the contribution of prepositional phrase in relation to external argument. It will also be argued that agentivity and causativity are introduced to the structure as different projections, with the passive projecting a voice projection, while the anti-causative does not so.

Keywords


Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E. (2007). Agent, causer and instrument PPs      in Greek. Handout of a talk given at the ‘Workshop on Greek Syntax and Semantics’, MIT.
Alexiadou, A. & Schafer, F. (2006a). Instrument subjects are agents or causers. In Proceedings of WCCFL 25, D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (eds), pp. 40–48. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
Alexiadou, A. & Schafer, F. (2006b). External argument realization in nominalization. Handout of a talk given at the ‘SFB 732 OpeningColloquium’. University of Stuttgart.
Alexiadou, A. (2006). On the morpho-syntax of anticausative verbs. Handout of a talk given at theWorkshop on Syntax, Lexicon and Event Structure (Honoring Anita Mittwoch on her 80th Birthday)’ University of Jerusalem.
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schafer, F. (2006a). The properties ofanticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of interpretation, M. Frascarelli (ed), pp. 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schafer, F. (2006b). The fine structure of (anti-)causatives. In Proceedings of NELS 36, C. Davis, A.-R. Deal & Y. Zabbal (eds), pp. 115–128. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Haig, G. L. J. (2004). Alignment in Kurdish: A Diachronic Prespective. Vorgelegt von.
Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (2002). Prolegomena to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from building 20, ed. By K. Hale and S. J. Keyser. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 53-110.
Kratzer, Angelika.(1996). Servering the External Argument from the Verb. In Johann Roorick and Laurie Zaring, (eds), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, pp. 109-137.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity. At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Levin, B. (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pylkkanen, M. (2002). Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin. (1998). Building Verb Meanings,in The Projection ofArguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, ed. by M. Butt and W. Geuder. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. pp. 97-134.
Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin. (2005). Argument Realization. Cambridge, UK: Research Surveys in Linguistics Series, Cambridge University Press.
Schäfer, F. (2008). The syntax of (anti- )causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.