Examining and Comparing Head and Heart Conceptualization in Shah Nameh (Book of Kings), Khosro-Shirin of Nezami and Shams' Ghazals (Sonnets) in the Cognitive View

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Persian Language and Literature, Firoozabad Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

The cognitive view considers metaphor a verbal-conceptual device that humans employ to recognize and express the concepts in their environment. Based on this theory, humans make many concepts understandable through metaphors. The present study is a descriptive-analytical research that relies on a cognitive approach to investigate and compare “head and heart” conceptualizations in Shah Nameh, Ghazaliyat-e Shams and Nezami's Khosrow and Shirin. The study, more specifically, seeks to answer the following questions: (1) What are the primary concepts used by the afore-mentioned poets in this mode of conceptualization? (2) What are the cognitive mechanisms used in these literary works to distinguish their poetic language from ordinary, everyday language? The findings of the present study indicate that the head and the heart were conceptualized in most metaphors through more objective entities such as “humans”, “animals”, “plants”, “container metaphors” and “objects.” Furthermore, although the poets in some cases used similar metaphors in accordance with their literary traditions, linguistic conventions, and cultural roots, they drew on such cognitive mechanisms as extending, negating and combining, while deviating from some linguistic rules, to create innovative images and contribute to the distinction of their conceptualizations.

Keywords

References

Gutierrez Perez R .(2008). A cross-cultural analysis of heart metaphors. Revista Alicantina de Estudios. Ingleses. 21. pp. 25-56.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of Metaphor, In Andrew      Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought, pp. 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: AField Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maalej, z. (2011). Figurative dimensions of 3ayn “eye” in Tunisian Arabic, In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment via body parts: studies from various languages and cultures. pp. 213-240. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Quinn, N, and Holland, D. (1987). Culture and cognition, In D. Holland and N.  Quinn (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, pp. 3-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radic-Bojanic, B., & Silaški, N. (2012). Metaphoric and metonymic conceptualizations of the head - A dictionary-based contrastive analysis of English and Serbian. Facta Universitatis, 10(1), pp. 29-39.
Sharifian, F. (2013). Conceptualizations of ruh ‘spirit/soul’ and jesm ‘body’in Persian: A sufi perspective. Sensuous Cognition: Explorations into­ Human Sentience: Imagination, (E)motion and Perception, pp.251-264.
Yu, N. (2004). The eyes for sight and mind/ Journal of pragmatics, 36 (4),pp. 663-686.
Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In Raymond Gibbs ed.,   the Cambridge  Hand  book of Metaphor and Though, pp.247-261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Journal of Iranian Dialects & Linguistics
Volume 4, Issue 2
February 2020
Pages 291-315

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 25 December 2019
  • Revise Date: 08 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 24 June 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics